Martin Kettle
BY Martin Kettle
No political party or established political culture is at ease with the kind of politics we are in at the moment.
The Tory party hates coalition, and dreams of reigniting a Thatcherite revolution if it improbably triumphs in 2015.
Labour, meanwhile, dreams of a social democratic Britain of the kind that eluded successive Labour governments.
And the Liberal Democrats dream of doubling their number of MPs by 2030. Honestly, they do.
The truth, though, is that these are all largely fantasies. The reality of British politics is at the interface between Liam Byrne’s infamous “there’s no more money” remark in 2010, and the general decline of the major political parties that has been so marked over half a century.
In the immediate postwar period almost everyone voted Labour or Conservative.
Now no more than two-thirds of voters do. The result is coalitions —either between parties or within them.
The central fact about British politics in 2013 is that we are beginning to get it. The economy is not recovering, but surviving.
Politics is taking time to adjust. At present it is like an F1 race permanently led by a safety car.
The rebalancing of the economy is talked about and desired on all sides but isn’t happening because, short of a command economy for which there is no serious appetite and which would almost certainly fail in its own way, it cannot be legislated.
The financial sector still overshadows everything else. And the deficit is too large.
So political parties find themselves, against their will and instincts, all in the same boat.
The Tories still hate higher taxes. Labour still hates cutting government programmes. The arguments between the parties are still real.
But they are constrained by the single great fact of austerity. And austerity is not going to go away.
All this supports the picture of people staying in work and accepting lower pay or shorter hours rather than allowing themselves to fall into unemployment.
If you could sum up the public mood in a sentence, it might be: “Things are getting worse but I’d rather hang on in there somehow, even at a cost.”
That’s a new mood, not heroic except in its will to survive —and political parties, with their comfortable visions and urge to do something memorable, are struggling to adapt to it.
Naturally, there are options about what to do. The Conservatives could be much more Thatcherite if they weren’t so aware of how unpopular that would be. Labour always has the Keynesian option of taxing and spending to boost the economy.
But that won’t do much to address the deficit, and there is no sign at all of a widespread public appetite for it.
The truth is that politics has changed and that the change will last a long time.
Party leaders understand this. David Cameron clearly does. This month’s spending review will offer more — a lot more —of the same, and the prospect of large further cuts still to come during the next parliament.
It’s not where he would like to be, but where he is. But last week’s speeches by Ed Miliband and Ed Balls show they get it too in their own way.
If there is a Labour government after 2015, it will not only cap the welfare budget — the details are a source of dispute —but will cut departmental spending still further.
Is it pretty? No. Are there alternatives? Certainly. But they have to be consistent with looking reality in the eye.
Since many of the problems are shared with other parts of Europe, it makes sense to address them together, not in competition. But looking in the other direction is not a serious option.
The figures and the graphs tell stories of opportunity and contain truths that cannot be ignored. Not only will the 2015 election now be an austerity election, but the 2020 election may be one as well. Better get used to it.
THE GUARDIAN
BY Martin Kettle
No political party or established political culture is at ease with the kind of politics we are in at the moment.
The Tory party hates coalition, and dreams of reigniting a Thatcherite revolution if it improbably triumphs in 2015.
Labour, meanwhile, dreams of a social democratic Britain of the kind that eluded successive Labour governments.
And the Liberal Democrats dream of doubling their number of MPs by 2030. Honestly, they do.
The truth, though, is that these are all largely fantasies. The reality of British politics is at the interface between Liam Byrne’s infamous “there’s no more money” remark in 2010, and the general decline of the major political parties that has been so marked over half a century.
In the immediate postwar period almost everyone voted Labour or Conservative.
Now no more than two-thirds of voters do. The result is coalitions —either between parties or within them.
The central fact about British politics in 2013 is that we are beginning to get it. The economy is not recovering, but surviving.
Politics is taking time to adjust. At present it is like an F1 race permanently led by a safety car.
The rebalancing of the economy is talked about and desired on all sides but isn’t happening because, short of a command economy for which there is no serious appetite and which would almost certainly fail in its own way, it cannot be legislated.
The financial sector still overshadows everything else. And the deficit is too large.
So political parties find themselves, against their will and instincts, all in the same boat.
The Tories still hate higher taxes. Labour still hates cutting government programmes. The arguments between the parties are still real.
But they are constrained by the single great fact of austerity. And austerity is not going to go away.
All this supports the picture of people staying in work and accepting lower pay or shorter hours rather than allowing themselves to fall into unemployment.
If you could sum up the public mood in a sentence, it might be: “Things are getting worse but I’d rather hang on in there somehow, even at a cost.”
That’s a new mood, not heroic except in its will to survive —and political parties, with their comfortable visions and urge to do something memorable, are struggling to adapt to it.
Naturally, there are options about what to do. The Conservatives could be much more Thatcherite if they weren’t so aware of how unpopular that would be. Labour always has the Keynesian option of taxing and spending to boost the economy.
But that won’t do much to address the deficit, and there is no sign at all of a widespread public appetite for it.
The truth is that politics has changed and that the change will last a long time.
Party leaders understand this. David Cameron clearly does. This month’s spending review will offer more — a lot more —of the same, and the prospect of large further cuts still to come during the next parliament.
It’s not where he would like to be, but where he is. But last week’s speeches by Ed Miliband and Ed Balls show they get it too in their own way.
If there is a Labour government after 2015, it will not only cap the welfare budget — the details are a source of dispute —but will cut departmental spending still further.
Is it pretty? No. Are there alternatives? Certainly. But they have to be consistent with looking reality in the eye.
Since many of the problems are shared with other parts of Europe, it makes sense to address them together, not in competition. But looking in the other direction is not a serious option.
The figures and the graphs tell stories of opportunity and contain truths that cannot be ignored. Not only will the 2015 election now be an austerity election, but the 2020 election may be one as well. Better get used to it.
THE GUARDIAN
