CHAIRMAN: DR. KHALID BIN THANI AL THANI
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: PROF. KHALID MUBARAK AL-SHAFI

Default / Miscellaneous

Rs60m compensation in NRI medical negligence case

Published: 25 Oct 2013 - 04:04 am | Last Updated: 28 Jan 2022 - 08:12 pm

New Delhi: The Supreme Court yesterday awarded Rs6,08,00,550 ($989,546) compensation to Indian-American doctor Kunal Saha, ordering the Kolkata-based Advance Medicare Research Institute (AMRI) to pay for medical negligence resulting in his wife Anuradha’s death in 1988.

A bench of Justice C K Prasad and Justice V Gopala Gowda passed the order in their judgment on an appeal by Saha, challenging the compensation of Rs17.2m awarded by National Consumer Forum. Cross appeals were also filed by AMRI and three doctors against the forum’s award.

Welcoming the verdict, Saha said the “historic” judgement should rekindle hope for countless victims.

The US-based NRI said it should tell many honest and caring doctors it is time to step forward and cleanse the system.

“If you let a few corrupt and politically connected doctors to run the show, all doctors will continue to share the blame and will never be able to restore public trust that we had not so long ago,” he said in a statement.

The court directed that the hospital would pay compensation to Saha, within eight weeks, along with yearly interest of 6 percent from the date of the complaint. Allowing AMRI to deduct what it had already paid, the court also asked to file a compliance report. It asked two doctors — Balram Prakash and Sukumar Mukharjee — to pay Saha Rs1m each and another doctor, Baidyanath Haldar, to pay Rs500,000.

Since three doctors, after the consumer forum decision, had already made payment in excess of one fixed by the apex court, the court said that they are entitled for reimbursement from AMRI, which should do so within eight weeks.

The court took several factors into account in fixing the compensation, over the forum’s Rs1,34,66,000.

Noting an increasing number of medical negligence cases coming before the consumer forums, the court said it hopes this verdict “acts as a deterrent and a reminder to those doctors, hospitals, the nursing homes and others connected establishments who do not take their responsibility seriously”. Speaking for the bench, Justice Gowda asked the central and the state governments to consider enacting laws wherever needed for effective functioning of private hospitals and nursing homes.”

Citing an earlier apex court judgment holding the right to health a fundamental right guaranteed under the Constitution’s Article 21, the court said doctors and hospitals are to be dealt with strictly if found “negligent with the patients who come to them pawning all their money with the hope to live a better life with dignity”.

“The patients irrespective of their social, cultural and economic background are entitled to be treated with dignity which not only forms their fundamental right but also their human right,” Justice Gowda said. IANS