HONG KONG: More than half-a-million people have voted in an unofficial Hong Kong electoral reform poll, organisers said yesterday, in a ballot hit by a massive cyberattack and labelled by Beijing as “illegal”.
Online polling started on Friday at noon and 514,996 residents had taken part in the “civil referendum”, which asks how voters would like to choose their next leader, by 5pm yesterday.
The former British colony’s leader is currently appointed by a 1,200-strong pro-Beijing committee but there have been increasingly vocal calls for residents to be able to choose who can run for the chief executive post.
China has promised direct elections for the next chief executive in 2017, but has ruled out allowing voters to choose which candidates can stand. Participation in the informal ballot has already beaten all expectations, surprising even its organisers, the Occupy Central movement.
The pro-democracy group said before launching the exercise, which runs until June 29, that they were hoping for 300,000 people to take part.
The 500,000 who had voted in the first 29 hours of the poll represents a sizeable chunk of the 3.47 million people who registered to vote at elections in 2012.
The ballot allows permanent residents of the semi-autonomous city to vote through a website or on a smartphone app and there are plans to open polling booths around the city today. But the online voting system has been targeted by a massive denial-of-service attack, with organisers swift to point the finger at China.
“We have reasonable suspicion to believe that Beijing was behind the attacks because which authority would have the resources and motivation?” Benny Tai, one of the founders of the Occupy Central movement, said. “It’s unprecedented in Hong Kong,” Tai said of the size of the attack.
Under the “one country, two systems” agreement reached when the city of seven million people was handed over from Britain to Communist-ruled China in 1997, Hong Kong has guaranteed civil liberties not enjoyed on the mainland, including free speech and the right to protest.